Infiniti Q50 · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Infiniti Q50 · Facelift 2017 S 3.0t · Stage 2vsInfiniti Q50 · Facelift 2017 S 3.0t · Stage 3vsInfiniti Q50 · Facelift 2017 S 3.0t · Stage 1vsInfiniti Q50 · Facelift 2017 S 3.0t
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonInfiniti Q50 · Facelift 2017
S 3.0t (Stage 3)
Infiniti Q50 · Facelift 2017
S 3.0t (Stage 1)
Infiniti Q50 · Facelift 2017
S 3.0t
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 S 3.0t (Stage 2) 526 hp
- Fastest top speed295 km/h183 mph Unrestricted280 km/h174 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,744 kg3,845 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.3 L/100 km17.7 mpg US21.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions206 g/km
- Best estimated range879 km546 mi
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 S 3.0t (Stage 3) 607 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.0 s
- Most powerful607 hp453 kW
- Highest torque736 Nm543 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight348 hp/t260 kW/t2.9 kg/hp
- Best overall score85/100
- Best performance score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t (Stage 2)526 hp | InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t (Stage 3)607 hp | InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t (Stage 1)478 hp | InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t405 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 526hp393kW+121 hp | 607hp453kW+202 hp | 478hp356kW+73 hp | 405hp302kW |
| Torque | 641Nm473lb-ft+166 Nm | 736Nm543lb-ft+261 Nm | 580Nm427lb-ft+105 Nm | 475Nm350lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,744kg3,845lb | 1,744kg3,845lb | 1,744kg3,845lb | 1,744kg3,845lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated | 292 km/h 181 mph | 273 km/h 170 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 42.1s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph-5.8 s Calculated | 35.8s99% target: 289 km/h / 180 mph-12.0 s Calculated | 42.3s99% target: 270 km/h / 168 mph-5.5 s Calculated | 47.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.3s-0.8 s | 4.0s-1.1 s | 4.6s-0.5 s | 5.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.2s-3.7 s Calculated | 10.1s-4.8 s Calculated | 12.8s-2.1 s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.2s-0.7 s Calculated | 3.8s-1.1 s Calculated | 4.4s-0.5 s Calculated | 4.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.3L/100 km17.7mpg US21.2mpg UK | 13.3L/100 km17.7mpg US21.2mpg UK | 13.3L/100 km17.7mpg US21.2mpg UK | 13.3L/100 km17.7mpg US21.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.0s-1.0 s Calculated | 11.5s-1.5 s Calculated | 12.4s-0.6 s Calculated | 13.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 302hp/t225kW/t137hp/1000 lb Calculated | 348hp/t260kW/t158hp/1000 lb Calculated | 274hp/t204kW/t124hp/1000 lb Calculated | 232hp/t173kW/t105hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 368Nm/t246lb-ft/ton Calculated | 422Nm/t282lb-ft/ton Calculated | 332Nm/t222lb-ft/ton Calculated | 272Nm/t182lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 879km546mi Calculated | 879km546mi Calculated | 879km546mi Calculated | 879km546mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,997cc183cu in | 2,997cc183cu in | 2,997cc183cu in | 2,997cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,810mm189in | 4,810mm189in | 4,810mm189in | 4,810mm189in |
| Width | 1,820mm72in | 1,820mm72in | 1,820mm72in | 1,820mm72in |
| Height | 1,430mm56in | 1,430mm56in | 1,430mm56in | 1,430mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,850mm112in | 2,850mm112in | 2,850mm112in | 2,850mm112in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 500L | 500L | 500L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 80L | 80L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | 206g/km | 206g/km | 206g/km | 206g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 S 3.0t (Stage 2) 526 hp: Power / Torque
- Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 S 3.0t (Stage 3) 607 hp: Power / Torque
- Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 S 3.0t (Stage 1) 478 hp: Power / Torque
- Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 S 3.0t 405 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t (Stage 2)526 hp | 6,400 rpm | 1,600-5,200 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t (Stage 3)607 hp | 6,400 rpm | 1,600-5,200 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t (Stage 1)478 hp | 6,400 rpm | 1,600-5,200 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t405 hp | 6,400 rpm | 1,600-5,200 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t (Stage 2)526 hp | InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t (Stage 3)607 hp | InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t (Stage 1)478 hp | InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t405 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.2 s | 3.8 s | 4.4 s | 4.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.3 s | 4.0 s | 4.6 s | 5.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.2 s | 10.1 s | 12.8 s | 14.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited | 292 km/h 181 mph | 273 km/h 170 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.2 s | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.4 s | 5.7 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.1 s | 7.8 s | 8.3 s | 8.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 9.8 s | 10.5 s | 11.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.0 s | 11.5 s | 12.4 s | 13.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 207 km/h 129 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | 197 km/h 122 mph | 187 km/h 116 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t (Stage 2)526 hp | 526 hp 393 kW |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t (Stage 3)607 hp | 607 hp 453 kW |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t (Stage 1)478 hp | 478 hp 356 kW |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t405 hp | 405 hp 302 kW |
Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 S 3.0t (Stage 3) 607 hp has 202 hp more than Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 S 3.0t 405 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 S 3.0t 405 hp and Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 S 3.0t (Stage 3) 607 hp: 202 hp (151 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t (Stage 2)526 hp | 641 Nm 473 lb-ft |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t (Stage 3)607 hp | 736 Nm 543 lb-ft |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t (Stage 1)478 hp | 580 Nm 427 lb-ft |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t405 hp | 475 Nm 350 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t (Stage 2)526 hp | 1,744 kg 3,845 lb |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t (Stage 3)607 hp | 1,744 kg 3,845 lb |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t (Stage 1)478 hp | 1,744 kg 3,845 lb |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t405 hp | 1,744 kg 3,845 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t (Stage 2)526 hp | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t (Stage 3)607 hp | 292 km/h 181 mph |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t (Stage 1)478 hp | 273 km/h 170 mph |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t405 hp | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t (Stage 2)526 hp | 4.3 s |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t (Stage 3)607 hp | 4.0 s |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t (Stage 1)478 hp | 4.6 s |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t405 hp | 5.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 S 3.0t (Stage 3) 607 hp and Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 S 3.0t 405 hp: 1.1 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 S 3.0t (Stage 2) 526 hp and Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 S 3.0t (Stage 1) 478 hp, separated by only 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t (Stage 2)526 hp | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t (Stage 3)607 hp | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t (Stage 1)478 hp | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t405 hp | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t (Stage 2)526 hp | 302 hp/t 225 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t (Stage 3)607 hp | 348 hp/t 260 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t (Stage 1)478 hp | 274 hp/t 204 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t405 hp | 232 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t (Stage 2)526 hp | 879 km 546 mi |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t (Stage 3)607 hp | 879 km 546 mi |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t (Stage 1)478 hp | 879 km 546 mi |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t405 hp | 879 km 546 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t (Stage 2)526 hp | 526 hp 393 kW | 4.3 s | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t (Stage 3)607 hp | 607 hp 453 kW | 4.0 s | 292 km/h 181 mph |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t (Stage 1)478 hp | 478 hp 356 kW | 4.6 s | 273 km/h 170 mph |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t405 hp | 405 hp 302 kW | 5.1 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t (Stage 2)526 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t (Stage 3)607 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t (Stage 1)478 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t405 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t (Stage 2)526 hp |
| 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t (Stage 3)607 hp |
| 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t (Stage 1)478 hp |
| 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t405 hp |
| 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 S 3.0t (Stage 3) 607 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t (Stage 2)526 hp | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 4.3 s |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t (Stage 3)607 hp | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 4.0 s |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t (Stage 1)478 hp | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t405 hp | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 5.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t (Stage 2)526 hp | 302 hp/t 225 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t (Stage 3)607 hp | 348 hp/t 260 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t (Stage 1)478 hp | 274 hp/t 204 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t405 hp | 232 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t (Stage 2)526 hp | InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t (Stage 3)607 hp | InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t (Stage 1)478 hp | InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t405 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 526 hp 393 kW | 607 hp 453 kW | 478 hp 356 kW | 405 hp 302 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 641 Nm 473 lb-ft | 736 Nm 543 lb-ft | 580 Nm 427 lb-ft | 475 Nm 350 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.3 s | 4.0 s | 4.6 s | 5.1 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | 292 km/h 181 mph | 273 km/h 170 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,744 kg 3,845 lb | 1,744 kg 3,845 lb | 1,744 kg 3,845 lb | 1,744 kg 3,845 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 879 km 546 mi | 879 km 546 mi | 879 km 546 mi | 879 km 546 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 206 g/km | 206 g/km | 206 g/km | 206 g/km | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 302 hp/t 225 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 348 hp/t 260 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 274 hp/t 204 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 232 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 S 3.0t (Stage 2) 526 hp | Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 S 3.0t (Stage 3) 607 hp | Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 S 3.0t (Stage 1) 478 hp | Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 S 3.0t 405 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK | 9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK | 9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK | 9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.92 LC100 km | 15.92 LC100 km | 15.92 LC100 km | 15.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.63 LC100 mi | 25.63 LC100 mi | 25.63 LC100 mi | 25.63 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal | 1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal | 1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal | 1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,389 LC/year | 2,389 LC/year | 2,389 LC/year | 2,389 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 S 3.0t (Stage 2) 526 hp
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest CO2 emissions
Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 S 3.0t (Stage 3) 607 hp
- Has 81 hp more
- Has 95 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 46 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























