BMW X6 M (F96)
Car comparison
BMW X6 M (F96) 4.4 V8 · Stage 3vsBMW X6 M (F96) 4.4 V8 · Stage 2vsBMW X6 M (F96) 4.4 V8 · Stage 1vsBMW X6 M (F96) 4.4 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X6 M (F96)
4.4 V8 (Stage 2)
BMW X6 M (F96)
4.4 V8 (Stage 1)
BMW X6 M (F96)
4.4 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X6 M (F96) 4.4 V8 (Stage 3) 900 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.0 s
- Fastest top speed292 km/h181 mph
- Most powerful900 hp671 kW
- Highest torque1,163 Nm857 lb-ft
- Lightest2,295 kg5,060 lb
- Best power-to-weight392 hp/t292 kW/t2.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.7 L/100 km18.5 mpg US22.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption17.5 L/100 km13.4 mpg US16.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption10.0 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions289 g/km
- Best estimated range654 km406 mi
- Largest trunk580 L
- Best overall score85/100
- Best performance score88/100
- Best economy score73/100
- Best practicality score79/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 (Stage 3)900 hp | BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 (Stage 2)780 hp | BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 (Stage 1)708 hp | BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8600 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 900hp671kW+300 hp | 780hp582kW+180 hp | 708hp528kW+108 hp | 600hp447kW |
| Torque | 1,163Nm857lb-ft+413 Nm | 1,013Nm747lb-ft+263 Nm | 915Nm675lb-ft+165 Nm | 750Nm553lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,295kg5,060lb | 2,295kg5,060lb | 2,295kg5,060lb | 2,295kg5,060lb |
| Gross weight | 3,000kg6,614lb | 3,000kg6,614lb | 3,000kg6,614lb | 3,000kg6,614lb |
| Top speed | 292 km/h 181 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated | 273 km/h 170 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 46.1s99% target: 289 km/h / 180 mph-2.7 s Calculated | 52.8s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph+4.0 s Calculated | 48.0s99% target: 270 km/h / 168 mph-0.8 s Calculated | 48.8s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.0s-0.9 s | 3.3s-0.6 s | 3.5s-0.4 s | 3.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.6s-3.9 s | 10.8s-2.7 s | 11.7s-1.8 s | 13.5s |
| 0-60 mph | 2.9s-0.8 s Calculated | 3.2s-0.6 s Calculated | 3.4s-0.4 s Calculated | 3.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK | 12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK | 12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK | 12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.5L/100 km13.4mpg US16.1mpg UK | 17.5L/100 km13.4mpg US16.1mpg UK | 17.5L/100 km13.4mpg US16.1mpg UK | 17.5L/100 km13.4mpg US16.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.8s-1.2 s Calculated | 11.2s-0.8 s Calculated | 11.5s-0.5 s Calculated | 12.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 392hp/t292kW/t178hp/1000 lb Calculated | 340hp/t253kW/t154hp/1000 lb Calculated | 308hp/t230kW/t140hp/1000 lb Calculated | 261hp/t195kW/t119hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 507Nm/t339lb-ft/ton Calculated | 441Nm/t295lb-ft/ton Calculated | 399Nm/t267lb-ft/ton Calculated | 327Nm/t219lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 654km406mi Calculated | 654km406mi Calculated | 654km406mi Calculated | 654km406mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,395cc268cu in | 4,395cc268cu in | 4,395cc268cu in | 4,395cc268cu in |
| Length | 4,941mm195in | 4,941mm195in | 4,941mm195in | 4,941mm195in |
| Width | 2,019mm79in | 2,019mm79in | 2,019mm79in | 2,019mm79in |
| Height | 1,692mm67in | 1,692mm67in | 1,692mm67in | 1,692mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,972mm117in | 2,972mm117in | 2,972mm117in | 2,972mm117in |
| Front track | 1,699mm67in | 1,699mm67in | 1,699mm67in | 1,699mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,688mm66in | 1,688mm66in | 1,688mm66in | 1,688mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 213mm8in | 213mm8in | 213mm8in | 213mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 580L | 580L | 580L | 580L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,530L | 1,530L | 1,530L | 1,530L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 83L | 83L | 83L | 83L |
| CO2 emissions | 289g/km | 289g/km | 289g/km | 289g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X6 M (F96) 4.4 V8 (Stage 3) 900 hp: Power / Torque
- BMW X6 M (F96) 4.4 V8 (Stage 2) 780 hp: Power / Torque
- BMW X6 M (F96) 4.4 V8 (Stage 1) 708 hp: Power / Torque
- BMW X6 M (F96) 4.4 V8 600 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 (Stage 3)900 hp | 6,000 rpm | 1,800-5,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 (Stage 2)780 hp | 6,000 rpm | 1,800-5,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 (Stage 1)708 hp | 6,000 rpm | 1,800-5,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8600 hp | 6,000 rpm | 1,800-5,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 (Stage 3)900 hp | BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 (Stage 2)780 hp | BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 (Stage 1)708 hp | BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8600 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.9 s | 3.2 s | 3.4 s | 3.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.0 s | 3.3 s | 3.5 s | 3.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.6 s | 10.8 s | 11.7 s | 13.5 s |
| Top speed | 292 km/h 181 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited | 273 km/h 170 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 1.8 s | 1.8 s | 1.9 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.7 s | 4.8 s | 5.0 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.0 s | 7.3 s | 7.5 s | 7.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.1 s | 9.4 s | 9.6 s | 10.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.8 s | 11.2 s | 11.5 s | 12.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 211 km/h 131 mph | 203 km/h 126 mph | 198 km/h 123 mph | 190 km/h 118 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 (Stage 3)900 hp | 900 hp 671 kW |
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 (Stage 2)780 hp | 780 hp 582 kW |
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 (Stage 1)708 hp | 708 hp 528 kW |
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8600 hp | 600 hp 447 kW |
BMW X6 M (F96) 4.4 V8 (Stage 3) 900 hp has 300 hp more than BMW X6 M (F96) 4.4 V8 600 hp.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X6 M (F96) 4.4 V8 600 hp and BMW X6 M (F96) 4.4 V8 (Stage 3) 900 hp: 300 hp (224 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 (Stage 3)900 hp | 1,163 Nm 857 lb-ft |
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 (Stage 2)780 hp | 1,013 Nm 747 lb-ft |
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 (Stage 1)708 hp | 915 Nm 675 lb-ft |
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8600 hp | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 (Stage 3)900 hp | 2,295 kg 5,060 lb |
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 (Stage 2)780 hp | 2,295 kg 5,060 lb |
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 (Stage 1)708 hp | 2,295 kg 5,060 lb |
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8600 hp | 2,295 kg 5,060 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 (Stage 3)900 hp | 292 km/h 181 mph |
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 (Stage 2)780 hp | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 (Stage 1)708 hp | 273 km/h 170 mph |
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8600 hp | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 (Stage 3)900 hp | 3.0 s |
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 (Stage 2)780 hp | 3.3 s |
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 (Stage 1)708 hp | 3.5 s |
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8600 hp | 3.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X6 M (F96) 4.4 V8 (Stage 3) 900 hp and BMW X6 M (F96) 4.4 V8 600 hp: 0.9 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are BMW X6 M (F96) 4.4 V8 (Stage 2) 780 hp and BMW X6 M (F96) 4.4 V8 (Stage 1) 708 hp, separated by only 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 (Stage 3)900 hp | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK |
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 (Stage 2)780 hp | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK |
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 (Stage 1)708 hp | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK |
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8600 hp | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 (Stage 3)900 hp | 392 hp/t 292 kW/t 2.5 kg/hp |
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 (Stage 2)780 hp | 340 hp/t 253 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp |
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 (Stage 1)708 hp | 308 hp/t 230 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp |
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8600 hp | 261 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 (Stage 3)900 hp | 654 km 406 mi |
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 (Stage 2)780 hp | 654 km 406 mi |
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 (Stage 1)708 hp | 654 km 406 mi |
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8600 hp | 654 km 406 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 (Stage 3)900 hp | 900 hp 671 kW | 3.0 s | 292 km/h 181 mph |
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 (Stage 2)780 hp | 780 hp 582 kW | 3.3 s | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 (Stage 1)708 hp | 708 hp 528 kW | 3.5 s | 273 km/h 170 mph |
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8600 hp | 600 hp 447 kW | 3.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 (Stage 3)900 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 (Stage 2)780 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 (Stage 1)708 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8600 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 (Stage 3)900 hp |
| 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 (Stage 2)780 hp |
| 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 (Stage 1)708 hp |
| 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8600 hp |
| 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X6 M (F96) 4.4 V8 (Stage 3) 900 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 (Stage 3)900 hp | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK | 3.0 s |
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 (Stage 2)780 hp | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK | 3.3 s |
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 (Stage 1)708 hp | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK | 3.5 s |
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8600 hp | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK | 3.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 (Stage 3)900 hp | 392 hp/t 292 kW/t 2.5 kg/hp | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK |
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 (Stage 2)780 hp | 340 hp/t 253 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK |
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 (Stage 1)708 hp | 308 hp/t 230 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK |
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8600 hp | 261 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 (Stage 3)900 hp | BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 (Stage 2)780 hp | BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 (Stage 1)708 hp | BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8600 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 900 hp 671 kW | 780 hp 582 kW | 708 hp 528 kW | 600 hp 447 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 1,163 Nm 857 lb-ft | 1,013 Nm 747 lb-ft | 915 Nm 675 lb-ft | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.0 s | 3.3 s | 3.5 s | 3.9 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 292 km/h 181 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | 273 km/h 170 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,295 kg 5,060 lb | 2,295 kg 5,060 lb | 2,295 kg 5,060 lb | 2,295 kg 5,060 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 654 km 406 mi | 654 km 406 mi | 654 km 406 mi | 654 km 406 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 289 g/km | 289 g/km | 289 g/km | 289 g/km | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 580 L 20.5 cu ft | 580 L 20.5 cu ft | 580 L 20.5 cu ft | 580 L 20.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 392 hp/t 292 kW/t 2.5 kg/hp | 340 hp/t 253 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 308 hp/t 230 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 261 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X6 M (F96) 4.4 V8 (Stage 3) 900 hp | BMW X6 M (F96) 4.4 V8 (Stage 2) 780 hp | BMW X6 M (F96) 4.4 V8 (Stage 1) 708 hp | BMW X6 M (F96) 4.4 V8 600 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.7 L/100 km18.5 mpg US22.2 mpg UK | 12.7 L/100 km18.5 mpg US22.2 mpg UK | 12.7 L/100 km18.5 mpg US22.2 mpg UK | 12.7 L/100 km18.5 mpg US22.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.22 LC100 km | 22.22 LC100 km | 22.22 LC100 km | 22.22 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 35.77 LC100 mi | 35.77 LC100 mi | 35.77 LC100 mi | 35.77 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,905 L503 US gal419 UK gal | 1,905 L503 US gal419 UK gal | 1,905 L503 US gal419 UK gal | 1,905 L503 US gal419 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,334 LC/year | 3,334 LC/year | 3,334 LC/year | 3,334 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X6 M (F96) 4.4 V8 (Stage 3) 900 hp
- Has 120 hp more
- Has 150 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 52 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW X6 M (F96) 4.4 V8 (Stage 2) 780 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























