BMW X6 M (F86)
Car comparison
BMW X6 M (F86) 4.4 V8 · Stage 3vsBMW X6 M (F86) 4.4 V8 · Stage 2vsBMW X6 M (F86) 4.4 V8 · Stage 1vsBMW X6 M (F86) 4.4 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X6 M (F86)
4.4 V8 (Stage 2)
BMW X6 M (F86)
4.4 V8 (Stage 1)
BMW X6 M (F86)
4.4 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X6 M (F86) 4.4 V8 (Stage 3) 862 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.3 s
- Fastest top speed292 km/h181 mph
- Most powerful862 hp643 kW
- Highest torque1,163 Nm857 lb-ft
- Lightest2,265 kg4,993 lb
- Best power-to-weight381 hp/t284 kW/t2.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption14.7 L/100 km16.0 mpg US19.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions258 g/km
- Best estimated range766 km476 mi
- Largest trunk550 L
- Best overall score88/100
- Best performance score88/100
- Best economy score77/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 (Stage 3)862 hp | BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 (Stage 2)747 hp | BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 (Stage 1)678 hp | BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8575 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 862hp643kW+287 hp | 747hp557kW+172 hp | 678hp506kW+103 hp | 575hp429kW |
| Torque | 1,163Nm857lb-ft+413 Nm | 1,013Nm747lb-ft+263 Nm | 915Nm675lb-ft+165 Nm | 750Nm553lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,265kg4,993lb | 2,265kg4,993lb | 2,265kg4,993lb | 2,265kg4,993lb |
| Gross weight | 2,950kg6,504lb | 2,950kg6,504lb | 2,950kg6,504lb | 2,950kg6,504lb |
| Top speed | 292 km/h 181 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated | 273 km/h 170 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 44.4s99% target: 289 km/h / 180 mph-9.3 s Calculated | 48.1s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph-5.5 s Calculated | 47.3s99% target: 270 km/h / 168 mph-6.4 s Calculated | 53.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.3s-0.9 s | 3.6s-0.6 s | 3.8s-0.4 s | 4.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.8s-4.9 s Calculated | 10.8s-3.9 s Calculated | 12.1s-2.6 s Calculated | 14.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.1s-0.9 s Calculated | 3.4s-0.6 s Calculated | 3.6s-0.4 s Calculated | 4.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.0s-1.3 s Calculated | 11.4s-0.9 s Calculated | 11.7s-0.6 s Calculated | 12.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 381hp/t284kW/t173hp/1000 lb Calculated | 330hp/t246kW/t150hp/1000 lb Calculated | 300hp/t223kW/t136hp/1000 lb Calculated | 254hp/t189kW/t115hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 513Nm/t343lb-ft/ton Calculated | 447Nm/t299lb-ft/ton Calculated | 404Nm/t270lb-ft/ton Calculated | 331Nm/t222lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 766km476mi Calculated | 766km476mi Calculated | 766km476mi Calculated | 766km476mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,395cc268cu in | 4,395cc268cu in | 4,395cc268cu in | 4,395cc268cu in |
| Length | 4,909mm193in | 4,909mm193in | 4,909mm193in | 4,909mm193in |
| Width | 1,989mm78in | 1,989mm78in | 1,989mm78in | 1,989mm78in |
| Height | 1,689mm66in | 1,689mm66in | 1,689mm66in | 1,689mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,933mm115in | 2,933mm115in | 2,933mm115in | 2,933mm115in |
| Front track | 1,666mm66in | 1,666mm66in | 1,666mm66in | 1,666mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,667mm66in | 1,667mm66in | 1,667mm66in | 1,667mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 195mm8in | 195mm8in | 195mm8in | 195mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 550L | 550L | 550L | 550L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,525L | 1,525L | 1,525L | 1,525L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 85L | 85L | 85L |
| CO2 emissions | 258g/km | 258g/km | 258g/km | 258g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X6 M (F86) 4.4 V8 (Stage 3) 862 hp: Power / Torque
- BMW X6 M (F86) 4.4 V8 (Stage 2) 747 hp: Power / Torque
- BMW X6 M (F86) 4.4 V8 (Stage 1) 678 hp: Power / Torque
- BMW X6 M (F86) 4.4 V8 575 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 (Stage 3)862 hp | 6,000-6,500 rpm | 2,200-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 (Stage 2)747 hp | 6,000-6,500 rpm | 2,200-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 (Stage 1)678 hp | 6,000-6,500 rpm | 2,200-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8575 hp | 6,000-6,500 rpm | 2,200-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 (Stage 3)862 hp | BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 (Stage 2)747 hp | BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 (Stage 1)678 hp | BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8575 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.1 s | 3.4 s | 3.6 s | 4.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.3 s | 3.6 s | 3.8 s | 4.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.8 s | 10.8 s | 12.1 s | 14.7 s |
| Top speed | 292 km/h 181 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited | 273 km/h 170 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 1.9 s | 2.0 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.8 s | 5.0 s | 5.1 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.2 s | 7.5 s | 7.7 s | 8.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.3 s | 9.6 s | 9.9 s | 10.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.0 s | 11.4 s | 11.7 s | 12.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 211 km/h 131 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | 197 km/h 123 mph | 186 km/h 115 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 (Stage 3)862 hp | 862 hp 643 kW |
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 (Stage 2)747 hp | 747 hp 557 kW |
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 (Stage 1)678 hp | 678 hp 506 kW |
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8575 hp | 575 hp 429 kW |
BMW X6 M (F86) 4.4 V8 (Stage 3) 862 hp has 287 hp more than BMW X6 M (F86) 4.4 V8 575 hp.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X6 M (F86) 4.4 V8 575 hp and BMW X6 M (F86) 4.4 V8 (Stage 3) 862 hp: 287 hp (214 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 (Stage 3)862 hp | 1,163 Nm 857 lb-ft |
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 (Stage 2)747 hp | 1,013 Nm 747 lb-ft |
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 (Stage 1)678 hp | 915 Nm 675 lb-ft |
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8575 hp | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 (Stage 3)862 hp | 2,265 kg 4,993 lb |
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 (Stage 2)747 hp | 2,265 kg 4,993 lb |
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 (Stage 1)678 hp | 2,265 kg 4,993 lb |
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8575 hp | 2,265 kg 4,993 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 (Stage 3)862 hp | 292 km/h 181 mph |
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 (Stage 2)747 hp | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 (Stage 1)678 hp | 273 km/h 170 mph |
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8575 hp | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 (Stage 3)862 hp | 3.3 s |
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 (Stage 2)747 hp | 3.6 s |
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 (Stage 1)678 hp | 3.8 s |
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8575 hp | 4.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X6 M (F86) 4.4 V8 (Stage 3) 862 hp and BMW X6 M (F86) 4.4 V8 575 hp: 0.9 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are BMW X6 M (F86) 4.4 V8 (Stage 2) 747 hp and BMW X6 M (F86) 4.4 V8 (Stage 1) 678 hp, separated by only 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 (Stage 3)862 hp | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 (Stage 2)747 hp | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 (Stage 1)678 hp | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8575 hp | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 (Stage 3)862 hp | 381 hp/t 284 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp |
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 (Stage 2)747 hp | 330 hp/t 246 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp |
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 (Stage 1)678 hp | 300 hp/t 223 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp |
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8575 hp | 254 hp/t 189 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 (Stage 3)862 hp | 766 km 476 mi |
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 (Stage 2)747 hp | 766 km 476 mi |
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 (Stage 1)678 hp | 766 km 476 mi |
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8575 hp | 766 km 476 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 (Stage 3)862 hp | 862 hp 643 kW | 3.3 s | 292 km/h 181 mph |
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 (Stage 2)747 hp | 747 hp 557 kW | 3.6 s | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 (Stage 1)678 hp | 678 hp 506 kW | 3.8 s | 273 km/h 170 mph |
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8575 hp | 575 hp 429 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 (Stage 3)862 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 (Stage 2)747 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 (Stage 1)678 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8575 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 (Stage 3)862 hp |
| 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 (Stage 2)747 hp |
| 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 (Stage 1)678 hp |
| 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8575 hp |
| 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X6 M (F86) 4.4 V8 (Stage 3) 862 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 (Stage 3)862 hp | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | 3.3 s |
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 (Stage 2)747 hp | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | 3.6 s |
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 (Stage 1)678 hp | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | 3.8 s |
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8575 hp | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 (Stage 3)862 hp | 381 hp/t 284 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 (Stage 2)747 hp | 330 hp/t 246 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 (Stage 1)678 hp | 300 hp/t 223 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8575 hp | 254 hp/t 189 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 (Stage 3)862 hp | BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 (Stage 2)747 hp | BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 (Stage 1)678 hp | BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8575 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 862 hp 643 kW | 747 hp 557 kW | 678 hp 506 kW | 575 hp 429 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 1,163 Nm 857 lb-ft | 1,013 Nm 747 lb-ft | 915 Nm 675 lb-ft | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.3 s | 3.6 s | 3.8 s | 4.2 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 292 km/h 181 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | 273 km/h 170 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,265 kg 4,993 lb | 2,265 kg 4,993 lb | 2,265 kg 4,993 lb | 2,265 kg 4,993 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 766 km 476 mi | 766 km 476 mi | 766 km 476 mi | 766 km 476 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 258 g/km | 258 g/km | 258 g/km | 258 g/km | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 381 hp/t 284 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp | 330 hp/t 246 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 300 hp/t 223 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 254 hp/t 189 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X6 M (F86) 4.4 V8 (Stage 3) 862 hp | BMW X6 M (F86) 4.4 V8 (Stage 2) 747 hp | BMW X6 M (F86) 4.4 V8 (Stage 1) 678 hp | BMW X6 M (F86) 4.4 V8 575 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK | 11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK | 11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK | 11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.43 LC100 km | 19.43 LC100 km | 19.43 LC100 km | 19.43 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.26 LC100 mi | 31.26 LC100 mi | 31.26 LC100 mi | 31.26 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal | 1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal | 1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal | 1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,914 LC/year | 2,914 LC/year | 2,914 LC/year | 2,914 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X6 M (F86) 4.4 V8 (Stage 3) 862 hp
- Has 115 hp more
- Has 150 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 51 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW X6 M (F86) 4.4 V8 (Stage 2) 747 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























