BMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010
Car comparison
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010 50i · Stage 3vsBMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010 50i · Stage 2vsBMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010 50i · Stage 1vsBMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010 50i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010
50i (Stage 2)
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010
50i (Stage 1)
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010
50i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 50i (Stage 3) 611 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.3 s
- Fastest top speed281 km/h175 mph
- Most powerful611 hp455 kW
- Highest torque930 Nm686 lb-ft
- Lightest2,190 kg4,828 lb
- Best power-to-weight279 hp/t208 kW/t3.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.5 L/100 km18.8 mpg US22.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption17.5 L/100 km13.4 mpg US16.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions292 g/km
- Best estimated range680 km423 mi
- Largest trunk620 L
- Best overall score86/100
- Best performance score84/100
- Best economy score73/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i (Stage 3)611 hp | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i (Stage 2)529 hp | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i (Stage 1)480 hp | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i407 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 611hp455kW+204 hp | 529hp395kW+122 hp | 480hp358kW+73 hp | 407hp304kW |
| Torque | 930Nm686lb-ft+330 Nm | 810Nm597lb-ft+210 Nm | 732Nm540lb-ft+132 Nm | 600Nm443lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,190kg4,828lb | 2,190kg4,828lb | 2,190kg4,828lb | 2,190kg4,828lb |
| Gross weight | 2,870kg6,327lb | 2,870kg6,327lb | 2,870kg6,327lb | 2,870kg6,327lb |
| Top speed | 281 km/h 175 mph | 269 km/h 167 mph | 262 km/h 163 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 56.3s99% target: 278 km/h / 173 mph-18.4 s Calculated | 62.6s99% target: 266 km/h / 165 mph-12.1 s Calculated | 67.1s99% target: 259 km/h / 161 mph-7.6 s Calculated | 74.7s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.3s-1.2 s | 4.7s-0.8 s | 5.0s-0.5 s | 5.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.4s-8.1 s Calculated | 15.8s-5.7 s Calculated | 17.6s-3.9 s Calculated | 21.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.1s-1.1 s Calculated | 4.4s-0.8 s Calculated | 4.7s-0.5 s Calculated | 5.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK | 12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK | 12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK | 12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.5L/100 km13.4mpg US16.1mpg UK | 17.5L/100 km13.4mpg US16.1mpg UK | 17.5L/100 km13.4mpg US16.1mpg UK | 17.5L/100 km13.4mpg US16.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.2s-1.5 s Calculated | 12.7s-0.9 s Calculated | 13.1s-0.6 s Calculated | 13.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 279hp/t208kW/t126hp/1000 lb Calculated | 242hp/t180kW/t110hp/1000 lb Calculated | 219hp/t164kW/t99hp/1000 lb Calculated | 186hp/t139kW/t84hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 425Nm/t284lb-ft/ton Calculated | 370Nm/t247lb-ft/ton Calculated | 334Nm/t224lb-ft/ton Calculated | 274Nm/t183lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 680km423mi Calculated | 680km423mi Calculated | 680km423mi Calculated | 680km423mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,395cc268cu in | 4,395cc268cu in | 4,395cc268cu in | 4,395cc268cu in |
| Length | 4,857mm191in | 4,857mm191in | 4,857mm191in | 4,857mm191in |
| Width | 1,933mm76in | 1,933mm76in | 1,933mm76in | 1,933mm76in |
| Height | 1,776mm70in | 1,776mm70in | 1,776mm70in | 1,776mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 2,933mm115in | 2,933mm115in | 2,933mm115in | 2,933mm115in |
| Front track | 1,640mm65in | 1,640mm65in | 1,640mm65in | 1,640mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,646mm65in | 1,646mm65in | 1,646mm65in | 1,646mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 222mm9in | 222mm9in | 222mm9in | 222mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 620L | 620L | 620L | 620L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,750L | 1,750L | 1,750L | 1,750L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 85L | 85L | 85L |
| CO2 emissions | 292g/km | 292g/km | 292g/km | 292g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 50i (Stage 3) 611 hp: Power / Torque
- BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 50i (Stage 2) 529 hp: Power / Torque
- BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 50i (Stage 1) 480 hp: Power / Torque
- BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 50i 407 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i (Stage 3)611 hp | 5,500-6,400 rpm | 1,750-4,500 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i (Stage 2)529 hp | 5,500-6,400 rpm | 1,750-4,500 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i (Stage 1)480 hp | 5,500-6,400 rpm | 1,750-4,500 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i407 hp | 5,500-6,400 rpm | 1,750-4,500 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i (Stage 3)611 hp | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i (Stage 2)529 hp | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i (Stage 1)480 hp | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i407 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.1 s | 4.4 s | 4.7 s | 5.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.3 s | 4.7 s | 5.0 s | 5.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.4 s | 15.8 s | 17.6 s | 21.5 s |
| Top speed | 281 km/h 175 mph | 269 km/h 167 mph | 262 km/h 163 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.6 s | 5.7 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.1 s | 8.4 s | 8.6 s | 8.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.3 s | 10.7 s | 11.0 s | 11.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.2 s | 12.7 s | 13.1 s | 13.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 192 km/h 119 mph | 182 km/h 113 mph | 176 km/h 109 mph | 167 km/h 104 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i (Stage 3)611 hp | 611 hp 455 kW |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i (Stage 2)529 hp | 529 hp 395 kW |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i (Stage 1)480 hp | 480 hp 358 kW |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i407 hp | 407 hp 304 kW |
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 50i (Stage 3) 611 hp has 204 hp more than BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 50i 407 hp.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 50i 407 hp and BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 50i (Stage 3) 611 hp: 204 hp (152 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i (Stage 3)611 hp | 930 Nm 686 lb-ft |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i (Stage 2)529 hp | 810 Nm 597 lb-ft |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i (Stage 1)480 hp | 732 Nm 540 lb-ft |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i407 hp | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i (Stage 3)611 hp | 2,190 kg 4,828 lb |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i (Stage 2)529 hp | 2,190 kg 4,828 lb |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i (Stage 1)480 hp | 2,190 kg 4,828 lb |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i407 hp | 2,190 kg 4,828 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i (Stage 3)611 hp | 281 km/h 175 mph |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i (Stage 2)529 hp | 269 km/h 167 mph |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i (Stage 1)480 hp | 262 km/h 163 mph |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i407 hp | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i (Stage 3)611 hp | 4.3 s |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i (Stage 2)529 hp | 4.7 s |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i (Stage 1)480 hp | 5.0 s |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i407 hp | 5.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 50i (Stage 3) 611 hp and BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 50i 407 hp: 1.2 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 50i (Stage 2) 529 hp and BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 50i (Stage 1) 480 hp, separated by only 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i (Stage 3)611 hp | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i (Stage 2)529 hp | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i (Stage 1)480 hp | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i407 hp | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i (Stage 3)611 hp | 279 hp/t 208 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i (Stage 2)529 hp | 242 hp/t 180 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i (Stage 1)480 hp | 219 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i407 hp | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i (Stage 3)611 hp | 680 km 423 mi |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i (Stage 2)529 hp | 680 km 423 mi |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i (Stage 1)480 hp | 680 km 423 mi |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i407 hp | 680 km 423 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i (Stage 3)611 hp | 611 hp 455 kW | 4.3 s | 281 km/h 175 mph |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i (Stage 2)529 hp | 529 hp 395 kW | 4.7 s | 269 km/h 167 mph |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i (Stage 1)480 hp | 480 hp 358 kW | 5.0 s | 262 km/h 163 mph |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i407 hp | 407 hp 304 kW | 5.5 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i (Stage 3)611 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i (Stage 2)529 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i (Stage 1)480 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i407 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i (Stage 3)611 hp |
| 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i (Stage 2)529 hp |
| 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i (Stage 1)480 hp |
| 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i407 hp |
| 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 50i (Stage 3) 611 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i (Stage 3)611 hp | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | 4.3 s |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i (Stage 2)529 hp | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i (Stage 1)480 hp | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | 5.0 s |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i407 hp | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i (Stage 3)611 hp | 279 hp/t 208 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i (Stage 2)529 hp | 242 hp/t 180 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i (Stage 1)480 hp | 219 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i407 hp | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i (Stage 3)611 hp | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i (Stage 2)529 hp | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i (Stage 1)480 hp | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i407 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 611 hp 455 kW | 529 hp 395 kW | 480 hp 358 kW | 407 hp 304 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 930 Nm 686 lb-ft | 810 Nm 597 lb-ft | 732 Nm 540 lb-ft | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.3 s | 4.7 s | 5.0 s | 5.5 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 281 km/h 175 mph | 269 km/h 167 mph | 262 km/h 163 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,190 kg 4,828 lb | 2,190 kg 4,828 lb | 2,190 kg 4,828 lb | 2,190 kg 4,828 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 680 km 423 mi | 680 km 423 mi | 680 km 423 mi | 680 km 423 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 292 g/km | 292 g/km | 292 g/km | 292 g/km | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 620 L 21.9 cu ft | 620 L 21.9 cu ft | 620 L 21.9 cu ft | 620 L 21.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 279 hp/t 208 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 242 hp/t 180 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 219 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 50i (Stage 3) 611 hp | BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 50i (Stage 2) 529 hp | BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 50i (Stage 1) 480 hp | BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 50i 407 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.5 L/100 km18.8 mpg US22.6 mpg UK | 12.5 L/100 km18.8 mpg US22.6 mpg UK | 12.5 L/100 km18.8 mpg US22.6 mpg UK | 12.5 L/100 km18.8 mpg US22.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.88 LC100 km | 21.88 LC100 km | 21.88 LC100 km | 21.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 35.20 LC100 mi | 35.20 LC100 mi | 35.20 LC100 mi | 35.20 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,875 L495 US gal412 UK gal | 1,875 L495 US gal412 UK gal | 1,875 L495 US gal412 UK gal | 1,875 L495 US gal412 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,281 LC/year | 3,281 LC/year | 3,281 LC/year | 3,281 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 50i (Stage 3) 611 hp
- Has 81 hp more
- Has 120 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 37 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 50i (Stage 2) 529 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























