AUDI TTS Roadster (8S)
Car comparison
AUDI TTS Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI · Stage 3vsAUDI TTS Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI · Stage 2vsAUDI TTS Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI · Stage 1vsAUDI TTS Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI TTS Roadster (8S)
2.0 TFSI (Stage 2)
AUDI TTS Roadster (8S)
2.0 TFSI (Stage 1)
AUDI TTS Roadster (8S)
2.0 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI TTS Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI (Stage 3) 465 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.0 s
- Fastest top speed317 km/h197 mph
- Most powerful465 hp347 kW
- Highest torque589 Nm434 lb-ft
- Lightest1,450 kg3,197 lb
- Best power-to-weight321 hp/t239 kW/t3.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions173 g/km
- Best estimated range733 km456 mi
- Largest trunk280 L
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score87/100
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score32/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI (Stage 3)465 hp | AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI (Stage 2)403 hp | AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI (Stage 1)366 hp | AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI310 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 465hp347kW+155 hp | 403hp301kW+93 hp | 366hp273kW+56 hp | 310hp231kW |
| Torque | 589Nm434lb-ft+209 Nm | 513Nm378lb-ft+133 Nm | 464Nm342lb-ft+84 Nm | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,450kg3,197lb | 1,450kg3,197lb | 1,450kg3,197lb | 1,450kg3,197lb |
| Gross weight | 1,770kg3,902lb | 1,770kg3,902lb | 1,770kg3,902lb | 1,770kg3,902lb |
| Top speed | 317 km/h 197 mph | 302 km/h 188 mph | 292 km/h 181 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 58.4s99% target: 314 km/h / 195 mph-6.8 s Calculated | 63.1s99% target: 299 km/h / 186 mph-2.1 s Calculated | 66.0s99% target: 289 km/h / 180 mph+0.9 s Calculated | 65.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.0s-1.2 s | 4.4s-0.8 s | 4.7s-0.5 s | 5.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.4s-6.6 s Calculated | 13.1s-5.0 s Calculated | 14.4s-3.7 s Calculated | 18.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.9s-1.1 s Calculated | 4.2s-0.7 s Calculated | 4.5s-0.5 s Calculated | 4.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.8s-1.5 s Calculated | 12.3s-1.0 s Calculated | 12.6s-0.7 s Calculated | 13.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 321hp/t239kW/t145hp/1000 lb Calculated | 278hp/t207kW/t126hp/1000 lb Calculated | 252hp/t188kW/t114hp/1000 lb Calculated | 214hp/t159kW/t97hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 406Nm/t272lb-ft/ton Calculated | 354Nm/t237lb-ft/ton Calculated | 320Nm/t214lb-ft/ton Calculated | 262Nm/t175lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 733km456mi Calculated | 733km456mi Calculated | 733km456mi Calculated | 733km456mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,191mm165in | 4,191mm165in | 4,191mm165in | 4,191mm165in |
| Width | 1,832mm72in | 1,832mm72in | 1,832mm72in | 1,832mm72in |
| Height | 1,345mm53in | 1,345mm53in | 1,345mm53in | 1,345mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,505mm99in | 2,505mm99in | 2,505mm99in | 2,505mm99in |
| Front track | 1,574mm62in | 1,574mm62in | 1,574mm62in | 1,574mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,553mm61in | 1,553mm61in | 1,553mm61in | 1,553mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 280L | 280L | 280L | 280L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 55L | 55L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 173g/km | 173g/km | 173g/km | 173g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI TTS Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI (Stage 3) 465 hp: Power / Torque
- AUDI TTS Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI (Stage 2) 403 hp: Power / Torque
- AUDI TTS Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI (Stage 1) 366 hp: Power / Torque
- AUDI TTS Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI 310 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI (Stage 3)465 hp | 5,800-6,200 rpm | 1,800-5,700 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI (Stage 2)403 hp | 5,800-6,200 rpm | 1,800-5,700 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI (Stage 1)366 hp | 5,800-6,200 rpm | 1,800-5,700 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI310 hp | 5,800-6,200 rpm | 1,800-5,700 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI (Stage 3)465 hp | AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI (Stage 2)403 hp | AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI (Stage 1)366 hp | AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI310 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.9 s | 4.2 s | 4.5 s | 4.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.0 s | 4.4 s | 4.7 s | 5.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.4 s | 13.1 s | 14.4 s | 18.0 s |
| Top speed | 317 km/h 197 mph | 302 km/h 188 mph | 292 km/h 181 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.5 s | 5.6 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.8 s | 8.2 s | 8.4 s | 8.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.0 s | 10.4 s | 10.7 s | 11.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.8 s | 12.3 s | 12.6 s | 13.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 204 km/h 127 mph | 194 km/h 121 mph | 188 km/h 117 mph | 175 km/h 109 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI (Stage 3)465 hp | 465 hp 347 kW |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI (Stage 2)403 hp | 403 hp 301 kW |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI (Stage 1)366 hp | 366 hp 273 kW |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI310 hp | 310 hp 231 kW |
AUDI TTS Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI (Stage 3) 465 hp has 155 hp more than AUDI TTS Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI 310 hp.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI TTS Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI 310 hp and AUDI TTS Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI (Stage 3) 465 hp: 155 hp (116 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI (Stage 3)465 hp | 589 Nm 434 lb-ft |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI (Stage 2)403 hp | 513 Nm 378 lb-ft |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI (Stage 1)366 hp | 464 Nm 342 lb-ft |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI310 hp | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI (Stage 3)465 hp | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI (Stage 2)403 hp | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI (Stage 1)366 hp | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI310 hp | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI (Stage 3)465 hp | 317 km/h 197 mph |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI (Stage 2)403 hp | 302 km/h 188 mph |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI (Stage 1)366 hp | 292 km/h 181 mph |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI310 hp | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI (Stage 3)465 hp | 4.0 s |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI (Stage 2)403 hp | 4.4 s |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI (Stage 1)366 hp | 4.7 s |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI310 hp | 5.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI TTS Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI (Stage 3) 465 hp and AUDI TTS Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI 310 hp: 1.2 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are AUDI TTS Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI (Stage 2) 403 hp and AUDI TTS Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI (Stage 1) 366 hp, separated by only 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI (Stage 3)465 hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI (Stage 2)403 hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI (Stage 1)366 hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI310 hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI (Stage 3)465 hp | 321 hp/t 239 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI (Stage 2)403 hp | 278 hp/t 207 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI (Stage 1)366 hp | 252 hp/t 188 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI310 hp | 214 hp/t 159 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI (Stage 3)465 hp | 733 km 456 mi |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI (Stage 2)403 hp | 733 km 456 mi |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI (Stage 1)366 hp | 733 km 456 mi |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI310 hp | 733 km 456 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI (Stage 3)465 hp | 465 hp 347 kW | 4.0 s | 317 km/h 197 mph |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI (Stage 2)403 hp | 403 hp 301 kW | 4.4 s | 302 km/h 188 mph |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI (Stage 1)366 hp | 366 hp 273 kW | 4.7 s | 292 km/h 181 mph |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI310 hp | 310 hp 231 kW | 5.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI (Stage 3)465 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI (Stage 2)403 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI (Stage 1)366 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI310 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI (Stage 3)465 hp |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI (Stage 2)403 hp |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI (Stage 1)366 hp |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI310 hp |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI TTS Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI (Stage 3) 465 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI (Stage 3)465 hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 4.0 s |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI (Stage 2)403 hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 4.4 s |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI (Stage 1)366 hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI310 hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI (Stage 3)465 hp | 321 hp/t 239 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI (Stage 2)403 hp | 278 hp/t 207 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI (Stage 1)366 hp | 252 hp/t 188 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI310 hp | 214 hp/t 159 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI (Stage 3)465 hp | AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI (Stage 2)403 hp | AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI (Stage 1)366 hp | AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI310 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 465 hp 347 kW | 403 hp 301 kW | 366 hp 273 kW | 310 hp 231 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 589 Nm 434 lb-ft | 513 Nm 378 lb-ft | 464 Nm 342 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.0 s | 4.4 s | 4.7 s | 5.2 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 317 km/h 197 mph | 302 km/h 188 mph | 292 km/h 181 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 733 km 456 mi | 733 km 456 mi | 733 km 456 mi | 733 km 456 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 173 g/km | 173 g/km | 173 g/km | 173 g/km | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 280 L 9.9 cu ft | 280 L 9.9 cu ft | 280 L 9.9 cu ft | 280 L 9.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 321 hp/t 239 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | 278 hp/t 207 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 252 hp/t 188 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 214 hp/t 159 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI TTS Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI (Stage 3) 465 hp | AUDI TTS Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI (Stage 2) 403 hp | AUDI TTS Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI (Stage 1) 366 hp | AUDI TTS Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI 310 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.13 LC100 km | 13.13 LC100 km | 13.13 LC100 km | 13.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,969 LC/year | 1,969 LC/year | 1,969 LC/year | 1,969 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI TTS Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI (Stage 3) 465 hp
- Has 62 hp more
- Has 76 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 43 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest CO2 emissions
AUDI TTS Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI (Stage 2) 403 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























