Audi TT Roadster (8N) · Facelift 2000
Car comparison
Audi TT Roadster (8N) · Facelift 2000 1.8 T · Stage 3vsAudi TT Roadster (8N) · Facelift 2000 1.8 T · Stage 2vsAudi TT Roadster (8N) · Facelift 2000 1.8 T · Stage 1vsAudi TT Roadster (8N) · Facelift 2000 1.8 T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAudi TT Roadster (8N) · Facelift 2000
1.8 T (Stage 2)
Audi TT Roadster (8N) · Facelift 2000
1.8 T (Stage 1)
Audi TT Roadster (8N) · Facelift 2000
1.8 T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Audi TT Roadster (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T (Stage 3) 337 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.4 s
- Fastest top speed277 km/h172 mph
- Most powerful337 hp252 kW
- Highest torque434 Nm320 lb-ft
- Lightest1,515 kg3,340 lb
- Best power-to-weight223 hp/t166 kW/t4.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.4 L/100 km25.0 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.3 L/100 km17.7 mpg US21.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions226 g/km
- Best estimated range660 km410 mi
- Largest trunk180 L
- Best overall score57/100
- Best performance score70/100
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score28/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T (Stage 3)337 hp | AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T (Stage 2)292 hp | AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T (Stage 1)265 hp | AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T225 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 337hp252kW+112 hp | 292hp218kW+67 hp | 265hp198kW+40 hp | 225hp168kW |
| Torque | 434Nm320lb-ft+154 Nm | 378Nm279lb-ft+98 Nm | 342Nm252lb-ft+62 Nm | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,515kg3,340lb | 1,515kg3,340lb | 1,515kg3,340lb | 1,515kg3,340lb |
| Gross weight | 1,815kg4,001lb | 1,815kg4,001lb | 1,815kg4,001lb | 1,815kg4,001lb |
| Top speed | 277 km/h 172 mph | 265 km/h 165 mph | 256 km/h 159 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 74.9s99% target: 274 km/h / 170 mph-9.1 s Calculated | 79.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph-4.1 s Calculated | 82.4s99% target: 253 km/h / 157 mph-1.6 s Calculated | 84.0s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.4s-1.6 s | 5.9s-1.0 s | 6.2s-0.7 s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.6s-11.3 s Calculated | 20.4s-8.5 s Calculated | 22.8s-6.1 s Calculated | 28.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.1s-1.4 s Calculated | 5.6s-1.0 s Calculated | 5.9s-0.6 s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.3L/100 km17.7mpg US21.2mpg UK | 13.3L/100 km17.7mpg US21.2mpg UK | 13.3L/100 km17.7mpg US21.2mpg UK | 13.3L/100 km17.7mpg US21.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.4s-1.5 s Calculated | 13.9s-1.0 s Calculated | 14.3s-0.6 s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 223hp/t166kW/t101hp/1000 lb Calculated | 193hp/t144kW/t88hp/1000 lb Calculated | 175hp/t131kW/t79hp/1000 lb Calculated | 149hp/t111kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 286Nm/t192lb-ft/ton Calculated | 250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated | 225Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated | 185Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 660km410mi Calculated | 660km410mi Calculated | 660km410mi Calculated | 660km410mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,781cc109cu in | 1,781cc109cu in | 1,781cc109cu in | 1,781cc109cu in |
| Length | 4,041mm159in | 4,041mm159in | 4,041mm159in | 4,041mm159in |
| Width | 1,764mm69in | 1,764mm69in | 1,764mm69in | 1,764mm69in |
| Height | 1,348mm53in | 1,348mm53in | 1,348mm53in | 1,348mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,429mm96in | 2,429mm96in | 2,429mm96in | 2,429mm96in |
| Front track | 1,528mm60in | 1,528mm60in | 1,528mm60in | 1,528mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,505mm59in | 1,505mm59in | 1,505mm59in | 1,505mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 180L | 180L | 180L | 180L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 62L | 62L | 62L |
| CO2 emissions | 226g/km | 226g/km | 226g/km | 226g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Audi TT Roadster (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T (Stage 3) 337 hp: Power / Torque
- Audi TT Roadster (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T (Stage 2) 292 hp: Power / Torque
- Audi TT Roadster (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T (Stage 1) 265 hp: Power / Torque
- Audi TT Roadster (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T 225 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T (Stage 3)337 hp | 5,900 rpm | 2,200-5,500 rpm | 6,150 rpm |
| AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T (Stage 2)292 hp | 5,900 rpm | 2,200-5,500 rpm | 6,150 rpm |
| AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T (Stage 1)265 hp | 5,900 rpm | 2,200-5,500 rpm | 6,150 rpm |
| AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T225 hp | 5,900 rpm | 2,200-5,500 rpm | 6,150 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T (Stage 3)337 hp | AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T (Stage 2)292 hp | AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T (Stage 1)265 hp | AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T225 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.1 s | 5.6 s | 5.9 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.4 s | 5.9 s | 6.2 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.6 s | 20.4 s | 22.8 s | 28.9 s |
| Top speed | 277 km/h 172 mph | 265 km/h 165 mph | 256 km/h 159 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 6.1 s | 6.2 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 9.2 s | 9.4 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.3 s | 11.8 s | 12.0 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.4 s | 13.9 s | 14.3 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 176 km/h 109 mph | 168 km/h 105 mph | 163 km/h 101 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T (Stage 3)337 hp | 337 hp 252 kW |
| AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T (Stage 2)292 hp | 292 hp 218 kW |
| AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T (Stage 1)265 hp | 265 hp 198 kW |
| AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T225 hp | 225 hp 168 kW |
Audi TT Roadster (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T (Stage 3) 337 hp has 112 hp more than Audi TT Roadster (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T 225 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Audi TT Roadster (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T 225 hp and Audi TT Roadster (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T (Stage 3) 337 hp: 112 hp (84 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T (Stage 3)337 hp | 434 Nm 320 lb-ft |
| AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T (Stage 2)292 hp | 378 Nm 279 lb-ft |
| AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T (Stage 1)265 hp | 342 Nm 252 lb-ft |
| AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T225 hp | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T (Stage 3)337 hp | 1,515 kg 3,340 lb |
| AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T (Stage 2)292 hp | 1,515 kg 3,340 lb |
| AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T (Stage 1)265 hp | 1,515 kg 3,340 lb |
| AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T225 hp | 1,515 kg 3,340 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T (Stage 3)337 hp | 277 km/h 172 mph |
| AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T (Stage 2)292 hp | 265 km/h 165 mph |
| AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T (Stage 1)265 hp | 256 km/h 159 mph |
| AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T225 hp | 237 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Audi TT Roadster (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T (Stage 3) 337 hp and Audi TT Roadster (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T 225 hp: 1.6 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Audi TT Roadster (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T (Stage 2) 292 hp and Audi TT Roadster (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T (Stage 1) 265 hp, separated by only 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T (Stage 3)337 hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T (Stage 2)292 hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T (Stage 1)265 hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T225 hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T (Stage 3)337 hp | 223 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
| AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T (Stage 2)292 hp | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
| AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T (Stage 1)265 hp | 175 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp |
| AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T225 hp | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T (Stage 3)337 hp | 660 km 410 mi |
| AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T (Stage 2)292 hp | 660 km 410 mi |
| AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T (Stage 1)265 hp | 660 km 410 mi |
| AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T225 hp | 660 km 410 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T (Stage 3)337 hp | 337 hp 252 kW | 5.4 s | 277 km/h 172 mph |
| AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T (Stage 2)292 hp | 292 hp 218 kW | 5.9 s | 265 km/h 165 mph |
| AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T (Stage 1)265 hp | 265 hp 198 kW | 6.2 s | 256 km/h 159 mph |
| AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T225 hp | 225 hp 168 kW | 6.9 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T (Stage 3)337 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T (Stage 2)292 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T (Stage 1)265 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T225 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T (Stage 3)337 hp |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T (Stage 2)292 hp |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T (Stage 1)265 hp |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T225 hp |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Audi TT Roadster (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T (Stage 3) 337 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T (Stage 3)337 hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 5.4 s |
| AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T (Stage 2)292 hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T (Stage 1)265 hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
| AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T225 hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T (Stage 3)337 hp | 223 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T (Stage 2)292 hp | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T (Stage 1)265 hp | 175 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T225 hp | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T (Stage 3)337 hp | AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T (Stage 2)292 hp | AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T (Stage 1)265 hp | AudiTT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T225 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 337 hp 252 kW | 292 hp 218 kW | 265 hp 198 kW | 225 hp 168 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 434 Nm 320 lb-ft | 378 Nm 279 lb-ft | 342 Nm 252 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.4 s | 5.9 s | 6.2 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 277 km/h 172 mph | 265 km/h 165 mph | 256 km/h 159 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,515 kg 3,340 lb | 1,515 kg 3,340 lb | 1,515 kg 3,340 lb | 1,515 kg 3,340 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 660 km 410 mi | 660 km 410 mi | 660 km 410 mi | 660 km 410 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 226 g/km | 226 g/km | 226 g/km | 226 g/km | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 180 L 6.4 cu ft | 180 L 6.4 cu ft | 180 L 6.4 cu ft | 180 L 6.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 223 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 175 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Audi TT Roadster (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T (Stage 3) 337 hp | Audi TT Roadster (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T (Stage 2) 292 hp | Audi TT Roadster (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T (Stage 1) 265 hp | Audi TT Roadster (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T 225 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.45 LC100 km | 16.45 LC100 km | 16.45 LC100 km | 16.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,468 LC/year | 2,468 LC/year | 2,468 LC/year | 2,468 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Audi TT Roadster (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T (Stage 3) 337 hp
- Has 45 hp more
- Has 56 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 30 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest CO2 emissions
Audi TT Roadster (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T (Stage 2) 292 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























