Audi TT Roadster (8J)
Car comparison
Audi TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI · Stage 3vsAudi TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI · Stage 2vsAudi TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI · Stage 1vsAudi TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAudi TT Roadster (8J)
2.0 TFSI (Stage 2)
Audi TT Roadster (8J)
2.0 TFSI (Stage 1)
Audi TT Roadster (8J)
2.0 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Audi TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI (Stage 3) 300 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.2 s
- Fastest top speed276 km/h171 mph
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Highest torque434 Nm320 lb-ft
- Lightest1,295 kg2,855 lb
- Best power-to-weight232 hp/t173 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.7 L/100 km22.0 mpg US26.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions186 g/km
- Best estimated range705 km438 mi
- Largest trunk250 L
- Best overall score57/100
- Best performance score70/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score30/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI (Stage 3)300 hp | AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI (Stage 2)260 hp | AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI (Stage 1)236 hp | AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI200 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW+100 hp | 260hp194kW+60 hp | 236hp176kW+36 hp | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 434Nm320lb-ft+154 Nm | 378Nm279lb-ft+98 Nm | 342Nm252lb-ft+62 Nm | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,295kg2,855lb | 1,295kg2,855lb | 1,295kg2,855lb | 1,295kg2,855lb |
| Gross weight | 1,615kg3,560lb | 1,615kg3,560lb | 1,615kg3,560lb | 1,615kg3,560lb |
| Top speed | 276 km/h 171 mph | 262 km/h 163 mph | 254 km/h 158 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 69.7s99% target: 273 km/h / 170 mph-9.1 s Calculated | 73.6s99% target: 259 km/h / 161 mph-5.3 s Calculated | 76.3s99% target: 251 km/h / 156 mph-2.5 s Calculated | 78.9s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.2s-1.5 s | 5.7s-1.0 s | 6.0s-0.7 s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.9s-10.7 s Calculated | 19.7s-7.8 s Calculated | 22.0s-5.6 s Calculated | 27.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.0s-1.4 s Calculated | 5.4s-0.9 s Calculated | 5.7s-0.6 s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.2s-1.5 s Calculated | 13.8s-1.0 s Calculated | 14.1s-0.6 s Calculated | 14.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 232hp/t173kW/t105hp/1000 lb Calculated | 201hp/t150kW/t91hp/1000 lb Calculated | 182hp/t136kW/t83hp/1000 lb Calculated | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 335Nm/t224lb-ft/ton Calculated | 292Nm/t195lb-ft/ton Calculated | 264Nm/t176lb-ft/ton Calculated | 216Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 705km438mi Calculated | 705km438mi Calculated | 705km438mi Calculated | 705km438mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,178mm164in | 4,178mm164in | 4,178mm164in | 4,178mm164in |
| Width | 1,842mm73in | 1,842mm73in | 1,842mm73in | 1,842mm73in |
| Height | 1,358mm53in | 1,358mm53in | 1,358mm53in | 1,358mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,468mm97in | 2,468mm97in | 2,468mm97in | 2,468mm97in |
| Front track | 1,572mm62in | 1,572mm62in | 1,572mm62in | 1,572mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,558mm61in | 1,558mm61in | 1,558mm61in | 1,558mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 250L | 250L | 250L | 250L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 55L | 55L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 186g/km | 186g/km | 186g/km | 186g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Audi TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI (Stage 3) 300 hp: Power / Torque
- Audi TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI (Stage 2) 260 hp: Power / Torque
- Audi TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI (Stage 1) 236 hp: Power / Torque
- Audi TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI 200 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI (Stage 3)300 hp | 5,100-6,000 rpm | 1,800-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI (Stage 2)260 hp | 5,100-6,000 rpm | 1,800-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI (Stage 1)236 hp | 5,100-6,000 rpm | 1,800-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI200 hp | 5,100-6,000 rpm | 1,800-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI (Stage 3)300 hp | AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI (Stage 2)260 hp | AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI (Stage 1)236 hp | AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI200 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.0 s | 5.4 s | 5.7 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.2 s | 5.7 s | 6.0 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.9 s | 19.7 s | 22.0 s | 27.6 s |
| Top speed | 276 km/h 171 mph | 262 km/h 163 mph | 254 km/h 158 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 6.1 s | 6.2 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.7 s | 9.1 s | 9.3 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.2 s | 11.6 s | 11.9 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.2 s | 13.8 s | 14.1 s | 14.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 178 km/h 111 mph | 170 km/h 106 mph | 165 km/h 103 mph | 157 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI (Stage 3)300 hp | 300 hp 224 kW |
| AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI (Stage 2)260 hp | 260 hp 194 kW |
| AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI (Stage 1)236 hp | 236 hp 176 kW |
| AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI200 hp | 200 hp 149 kW |
Audi TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI (Stage 3) 300 hp has 100 hp more than Audi TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI 200 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Audi TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI 200 hp and Audi TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI (Stage 3) 300 hp: 100 hp (75 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI (Stage 3)300 hp | 434 Nm 320 lb-ft |
| AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI (Stage 2)260 hp | 378 Nm 279 lb-ft |
| AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI (Stage 1)236 hp | 342 Nm 252 lb-ft |
| AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI200 hp | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI (Stage 3)300 hp | 1,295 kg 2,855 lb |
| AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI (Stage 2)260 hp | 1,295 kg 2,855 lb |
| AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI (Stage 1)236 hp | 1,295 kg 2,855 lb |
| AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI200 hp | 1,295 kg 2,855 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI (Stage 3)300 hp | 276 km/h 171 mph |
| AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI (Stage 2)260 hp | 262 km/h 163 mph |
| AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI (Stage 1)236 hp | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI200 hp | 237 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI (Stage 3)300 hp | 5.2 s |
| AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI (Stage 2)260 hp | 5.7 s |
| AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI (Stage 1)236 hp | 6.0 s |
| AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI200 hp | 6.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Audi TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI (Stage 3) 300 hp and Audi TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI 200 hp: 1.5 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Audi TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI (Stage 2) 260 hp and Audi TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI (Stage 1) 236 hp, separated by only 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI (Stage 3)300 hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI (Stage 2)260 hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI (Stage 1)236 hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI200 hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI (Stage 3)300 hp | 232 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI (Stage 2)260 hp | 201 hp/t 150 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
| AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI (Stage 1)236 hp | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
| AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI200 hp | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI (Stage 3)300 hp | 705 km 438 mi |
| AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI (Stage 2)260 hp | 705 km 438 mi |
| AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI (Stage 1)236 hp | 705 km 438 mi |
| AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI200 hp | 705 km 438 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI (Stage 3)300 hp | 300 hp 224 kW | 5.2 s | 276 km/h 171 mph |
| AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI (Stage 2)260 hp | 260 hp 194 kW | 5.7 s | 262 km/h 163 mph |
| AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI (Stage 1)236 hp | 236 hp 176 kW | 6.0 s | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI200 hp | 200 hp 149 kW | 6.7 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI (Stage 3)300 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI (Stage 2)260 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI (Stage 1)236 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI200 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI (Stage 3)300 hp |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI (Stage 2)260 hp |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI (Stage 1)236 hp |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI200 hp |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Audi TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI (Stage 3) 300 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI (Stage 3)300 hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
| AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI (Stage 2)260 hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
| AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI (Stage 1)236 hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 6.0 s |
| AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI200 hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI (Stage 3)300 hp | 232 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI (Stage 2)260 hp | 201 hp/t 150 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI (Stage 1)236 hp | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI200 hp | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI (Stage 3)300 hp | AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI (Stage 2)260 hp | AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI (Stage 1)236 hp | AudiTT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI200 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 260 hp 194 kW | 236 hp 176 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 434 Nm 320 lb-ft | 378 Nm 279 lb-ft | 342 Nm 252 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.2 s | 5.7 s | 6.0 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 276 km/h 171 mph | 262 km/h 163 mph | 254 km/h 158 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,295 kg 2,855 lb | 1,295 kg 2,855 lb | 1,295 kg 2,855 lb | 1,295 kg 2,855 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 705 km 438 mi | 705 km 438 mi | 705 km 438 mi | 705 km 438 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 186 g/km | 186 g/km | 186 g/km | 186 g/km | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 250 L 8.8 cu ft | 250 L 8.8 cu ft | 250 L 8.8 cu ft | 250 L 8.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 232 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 201 hp/t 150 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Audi TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI (Stage 3) 300 hp | Audi TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI (Stage 2) 260 hp | Audi TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI (Stage 1) 236 hp | Audi TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI 200 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.65 LC100 km | 13.65 LC100 km | 13.65 LC100 km | 13.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,048 LC/year | 2,048 LC/year | 2,048 LC/year | 2,048 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Audi TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI (Stage 3) 300 hp
- Has 40 hp more
- Has 56 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 31 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest CO2 emissions
Audi TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI (Stage 2) 260 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























