Abarth 695
Car comparison
Abarth 695 XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet · Stage 3vsAbarth 695 XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet · Stage 2vsAbarth 695 XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet · Stage 1vsAbarth 695 XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAbarth 695
XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 2)
Abarth 695
XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 1)
Abarth 695
XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Abarth 695 XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 3) 247 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.7 s
- Fastest top speed254 km/h158 mph
- Most powerful247 hp185 kW
- Highest torque357 Nm263 lb-ft
- Lightest1,110 kg2,447 lb
- Best power-to-weight223 hp/t166 kW/t4.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions139 g/km
- Best estimated range583 km362 mi
- Largest trunk185 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score63/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score55/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 3)247 hp | Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 2)214 hp | Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 1)195 hp | Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet165 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 247hp185kW+82 hp | 214hp160kW+49 hp | 195hp145kW+30 hp | 165hp123kW |
| Torque | 357Nm263lb-ft+127 Nm | 311Nm229lb-ft+81 Nm | 281Nm207lb-ft+51 Nm | 230Nm170lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,110kg2,447lb | 1,110kg2,447lb | 1,110kg2,447lb | 1,110kg2,447lb |
| Gross weight | 1,425kg3,142lb | 1,425kg3,142lb | 1,425kg3,142lb | 1,425kg3,142lb |
| Top speed | 254 km/h 158 mph | 243 km/h 151 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 60.7s99% target: 251 km/h / 156 mph-9.4 s Calculated | 65.6s99% target: 241 km/h / 149 mph-4.5 s Calculated | 69.1s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph-1.0 s Calculated | 70.1s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.7s-1.6 s | 6.2s-1.1 s | 6.6s-0.7 s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.9s-17.0 s Calculated | 22.6s-13.4 s Calculated | 25.3s-10.6 s Calculated | 36.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.4s-1.5 s Calculated | 5.9s-1.0 s Calculated | 6.3s-0.7 s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.7s-1.6 s Calculated | 14.3s-1.0 s Calculated | 14.6s-0.7 s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 223hp/t166kW/t101hp/1000 lb Calculated | 193hp/t144kW/t88hp/1000 lb Calculated | 175hp/t131kW/t80hp/1000 lb Calculated | 149hp/t111kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 321Nm/t215lb-ft/ton Calculated | 280Nm/t187lb-ft/ton Calculated | 253Nm/t169lb-ft/ton Calculated | 207Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 583km362mi Calculated | 583km362mi Calculated | 583km362mi Calculated | 583km362mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,368cc83cu in | 1,368cc83cu in | 1,368cc83cu in | 1,368cc83cu in |
| Length | 3,657mm144in | 3,657mm144in | 3,657mm144in | 3,657mm144in |
| Width | 1,647mm65in | 1,647mm65in | 1,647mm65in | 1,647mm65in |
| Height | 1,485mm58in | 1,485mm58in | 1,485mm58in | 1,485mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,300mm91in | 2,300mm91in | 2,300mm91in | 2,300mm91in |
| Trunk volume | 185L | 185L | 185L | 185L |
| Max trunk volume | 610L | 610L | 610L | 610L |
| Doors | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 35L | 35L | 35L | 35L |
| CO2 emissions | 139g/km | 139g/km | 139g/km | 139g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Abarth 695 XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 3) 247 hp: Power / Torque
- Abarth 695 XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 2) 214 hp: Power / Torque
- Abarth 695 XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 1) 195 hp: Power / Torque
- Abarth 695 XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet 165 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 3)247 hp | 5,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 2)214 hp | 5,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 1)195 hp | 5,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet165 hp | 5,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 3)247 hp | Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 2)214 hp | Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 1)195 hp | Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet165 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.4 s | 5.9 s | 6.3 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.7 s | 6.2 s | 6.6 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.9 s | 22.6 s | 25.3 s | 36.0 s |
| Top speed | 254 km/h 158 mph | 243 km/h 151 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.3 s | 6.4 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.4 s | 9.6 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.6 s | 12.0 s | 12.3 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.7 s | 14.3 s | 14.6 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 173 km/h 108 mph | 165 km/h 103 mph | 160 km/h 100 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 3)247 hp | 247 hp 185 kW |
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 2)214 hp | 214 hp 160 kW |
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 1)195 hp | 195 hp 145 kW |
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet165 hp | 165 hp 123 kW |
Abarth 695 XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 3) 247 hp has 82 hp more than Abarth 695 XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet 165 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Abarth 695 XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet 165 hp and Abarth 695 XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 3) 247 hp: 82 hp (62 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 3)247 hp | 357 Nm 263 lb-ft |
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 2)214 hp | 311 Nm 229 lb-ft |
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 1)195 hp | 281 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet165 hp | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 3)247 hp | 1,110 kg 2,447 lb |
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 2)214 hp | 1,110 kg 2,447 lb |
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 1)195 hp | 1,110 kg 2,447 lb |
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet165 hp | 1,110 kg 2,447 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 3)247 hp | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 2)214 hp | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 1)195 hp | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet165 hp | 217 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 3)247 hp | 5.7 s |
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 2)214 hp | 6.2 s |
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 1)195 hp | 6.6 s |
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet165 hp | 7.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Abarth 695 XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 3) 247 hp and Abarth 695 XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet 165 hp: 1.6 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Abarth 695 XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 2) 214 hp and Abarth 695 XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 1) 195 hp, separated by only 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 3)247 hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 2)214 hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 1)195 hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet165 hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 3)247 hp | 223 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 2)214 hp | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 1)195 hp | 175 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp |
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet165 hp | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 3)247 hp | 583 km 362 mi |
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 2)214 hp | 583 km 362 mi |
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 1)195 hp | 583 km 362 mi |
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet165 hp | 583 km 362 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 3)247 hp | 247 hp 185 kW | 5.7 s | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 2)214 hp | 214 hp 160 kW | 6.2 s | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 1)195 hp | 195 hp 145 kW | 6.6 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet165 hp | 165 hp 123 kW | 7.3 s | 217 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 3)247 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 2)214 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 1)195 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet165 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 3)247 hp |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 2)214 hp |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 1)195 hp |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet165 hp |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Abarth 695 XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 3) 247 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 3)247 hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 2)214 hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 1)195 hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet165 hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 3)247 hp | 223 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 2)214 hp | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 1)195 hp | 175 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet165 hp | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 3)247 hp | Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 2)214 hp | Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 1)195 hp | Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet165 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 247 hp 185 kW | 214 hp 160 kW | 195 hp 145 kW | 165 hp 123 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 357 Nm 263 lb-ft | 311 Nm 229 lb-ft | 281 Nm 207 lb-ft | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.7 s | 6.2 s | 6.6 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 254 km/h 158 mph | 243 km/h 151 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,110 kg 2,447 lb | 1,110 kg 2,447 lb | 1,110 kg 2,447 lb | 1,110 kg 2,447 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 583 km 362 mi | 583 km 362 mi | 583 km 362 mi | 583 km 362 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 139 g/km | 139 g/km | 139 g/km | 139 g/km | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 185 L 6.5 cu ft | 185 L 6.5 cu ft | 185 L 6.5 cu ft | 185 L 6.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 223 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 175 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Abarth 695 XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 3) 247 hp | Abarth 695 XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 2) 214 hp | Abarth 695 XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 1) 195 hp | Abarth 695 XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet 165 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.50 LC100 km | 10.50 LC100 km | 10.50 LC100 km | 10.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,575 LC/year | 1,575 LC/year | 1,575 LC/year | 1,575 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Abarth 695 XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 3) 247 hp
- Has 33 hp more
- Has 46 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 30 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest CO2 emissions
Abarth 695 XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 2) 214 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























