Abarth 595C · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
Abarth 595C · Facelift 2016 Pista 1.4 T-Jet · Stage 3vsAbarth 595C · Facelift 2016 Pista 1.4 T-Jet · Stage 2vsAbarth 595C · Facelift 2016 Pista 1.4 T-Jet · Stage 1vsAbarth 595C · Facelift 2016 Pista 1.4 T-Jet
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAbarth 595C · Facelift 2016
Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 2)
Abarth 595C · Facelift 2016
Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 1)
Abarth 595C · Facelift 2016
Pista 1.4 T-Jet
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Abarth 595C Facelift 2016 Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 3) 240 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.7 s
- Fastest top speed252 km/h157 mph
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Highest torque357 Nm263 lb-ft
- Lightest1,075 kg2,370 lb
- Best power-to-weight223 hp/t166 kW/t4.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions139 g/km
- Best estimated range583 km362 mi
- Largest trunk185 L
- Best overall score57/100
- Best performance score63/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score43/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 3)240 hp | Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 2)208 hp | Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 1)189 hp | Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet160 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW+80 hp | 208hp155kW+48 hp | 189hp141kW+29 hp | 160hp119kW |
| Torque | 357Nm263lb-ft+127 Nm | 311Nm229lb-ft+81 Nm | 281Nm207lb-ft+51 Nm | 230Nm170lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,075kg2,370lb | 1,075kg2,370lb | 1,075kg2,370lb | 1,075kg2,370lb |
| Top speed | 252 km/h 157 mph | 239 km/h 149 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 66.5s99% target: 249 km/h / 155 mph-9.1 s Calculated | 70.4s99% target: 237 km/h / 147 mph-5.2 s Calculated | 72.8s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph-2.8 s Calculated | 75.6s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.7s-1.6 s | 6.2s-1.1 s | 6.6s-0.7 s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.1s-18.7 s Calculated | 24.4s-14.4 s Calculated | 28.1s-10.8 s Calculated | 38.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.4s-1.5 s Calculated | 5.9s-1.0 s Calculated | 6.2s-0.7 s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s-1.5 s Calculated | 14.3s-1.0 s Calculated | 14.7s-0.6 s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 223hp/t166kW/t101hp/1000 lb Calculated | 193hp/t144kW/t88hp/1000 lb Calculated | 176hp/t131kW/t80hp/1000 lb Calculated | 149hp/t111kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 332Nm/t222lb-ft/ton Calculated | 289Nm/t193lb-ft/ton Calculated | 261Nm/t175lb-ft/ton Calculated | 214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 583km362mi Calculated | 583km362mi Calculated | 583km362mi Calculated | 583km362mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,368cc83cu in | 1,368cc83cu in | 1,368cc83cu in | 1,368cc83cu in |
| Length | 3,660mm144in | 3,660mm144in | 3,660mm144in | 3,660mm144in |
| Width | 1,627mm64in | 1,627mm64in | 1,627mm64in | 1,627mm64in |
| Height | 1,485mm58in | 1,485mm58in | 1,485mm58in | 1,485mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,300mm91in | 2,300mm91in | 2,300mm91in | 2,300mm91in |
| Front track | 1,415mm56in | 1,415mm56in | 1,415mm56in | 1,415mm56in |
| Rear track | 1,408mm55in | 1,408mm55in | 1,408mm55in | 1,408mm55in |
| Trunk volume | 185L | 185L | 185L | 185L |
| Doors | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 35L | 35L | 35L | 35L |
| CO2 emissions | 139g/km | 139g/km | 139g/km | 139g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Abarth 595C Facelift 2016 Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 3) 240 hp: Power / Torque
- Abarth 595C Facelift 2016 Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 2) 208 hp: Power / Torque
- Abarth 595C Facelift 2016 Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 1) 189 hp: Power / Torque
- Abarth 595C Facelift 2016 Pista 1.4 T-Jet 160 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 3)240 hp | 5,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 2)208 hp | 5,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 1)189 hp | 5,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet160 hp | 5,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 3)240 hp | Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 2)208 hp | Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 1)189 hp | Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet160 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.4 s | 5.9 s | 6.2 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.7 s | 6.2 s | 6.6 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.1 s | 24.4 s | 28.1 s | 38.8 s |
| Top speed | 252 km/h 157 mph | 239 km/h 149 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.2 s | 6.4 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.0 s | 9.4 s | 9.6 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.6 s | 12.1 s | 12.3 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 14.3 s | 14.7 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 170 km/h 106 mph | 162 km/h 101 mph | 157 km/h 98 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 3)240 hp | 240 hp 179 kW |
| Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 2)208 hp | 208 hp 155 kW |
| Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 1)189 hp | 189 hp 141 kW |
| Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet160 hp | 160 hp 119 kW |
Abarth 595C Facelift 2016 Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 3) 240 hp has 80 hp more than Abarth 595C Facelift 2016 Pista 1.4 T-Jet 160 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Abarth 595C Facelift 2016 Pista 1.4 T-Jet 160 hp and Abarth 595C Facelift 2016 Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 3) 240 hp: 80 hp (60 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 3)240 hp | 357 Nm 263 lb-ft |
| Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 2)208 hp | 311 Nm 229 lb-ft |
| Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 1)189 hp | 281 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet160 hp | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 3)240 hp | 1,075 kg 2,370 lb |
| Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 2)208 hp | 1,075 kg 2,370 lb |
| Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 1)189 hp | 1,075 kg 2,370 lb |
| Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet160 hp | 1,075 kg 2,370 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 3)240 hp | 252 km/h 157 mph |
| Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 2)208 hp | 239 km/h 149 mph |
| Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 1)189 hp | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet160 hp | 216 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Abarth 595C Facelift 2016 Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 3) 240 hp and Abarth 595C Facelift 2016 Pista 1.4 T-Jet 160 hp: 1.6 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Abarth 595C Facelift 2016 Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 2) 208 hp and Abarth 595C Facelift 2016 Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 1) 189 hp, separated by only 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 3)240 hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 2)208 hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 1)189 hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet160 hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 3)240 hp | 223 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
| Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 2)208 hp | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
| Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 1)189 hp | 176 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp |
| Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet160 hp | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 3)240 hp | 583 km 362 mi |
| Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 2)208 hp | 583 km 362 mi |
| Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 1)189 hp | 583 km 362 mi |
| Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet160 hp | 583 km 362 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 3)240 hp | 240 hp 179 kW | 5.7 s | 252 km/h 157 mph |
| Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 2)208 hp | 208 hp 155 kW | 6.2 s | 239 km/h 149 mph |
| Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 1)189 hp | 189 hp 141 kW | 6.6 s | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet160 hp | 160 hp 119 kW | 7.3 s | 216 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 3)240 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 2)208 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 1)189 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet160 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 3)240 hp |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 2)208 hp |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 1)189 hp |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet160 hp |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Abarth 595C Facelift 2016 Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 3) 240 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 3)240 hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
| Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 2)208 hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
| Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 1)189 hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
| Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet160 hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 3)240 hp | 223 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 2)208 hp | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 1)189 hp | 176 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet160 hp | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 3)240 hp | Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 2)208 hp | Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 1)189 hp | Abarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet160 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 208 hp 155 kW | 189 hp 141 kW | 160 hp 119 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 357 Nm 263 lb-ft | 311 Nm 229 lb-ft | 281 Nm 207 lb-ft | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.7 s | 6.2 s | 6.6 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 252 km/h 157 mph | 239 km/h 149 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph | 216 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,075 kg 2,370 lb | 1,075 kg 2,370 lb | 1,075 kg 2,370 lb | 1,075 kg 2,370 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 583 km 362 mi | 583 km 362 mi | 583 km 362 mi | 583 km 362 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 139 g/km | 139 g/km | 139 g/km | 139 g/km | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 185 L 6.5 cu ft | 185 L 6.5 cu ft | 185 L 6.5 cu ft | 185 L 6.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 223 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 176 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Abarth 595C Facelift 2016 Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 3) 240 hp | Abarth 595C Facelift 2016 Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 2) 208 hp | Abarth 595C Facelift 2016 Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 1) 189 hp | Abarth 595C Facelift 2016 Pista 1.4 T-Jet 160 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.50 LC100 km | 10.50 LC100 km | 10.50 LC100 km | 10.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,575 LC/year | 1,575 LC/year | 1,575 LC/year | 1,575 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Abarth 595C Facelift 2016 Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 3) 240 hp
- Has 32 hp more
- Has 46 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Has 30 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest CO2 emissions
Abarth 595C Facelift 2016 Pista 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 2) 208 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























